Committee Members traveled to Mexico to meet with government officials
and private sector organizations on matters related to U.S. agricultural
trade. The United States and Mexico share the goals of open and
fair trade and the reduction of barriers to world-wide agriculture
trade. The issues discussed included non-tariff trade barriers;
continuation of efforts to liberalize world-wide agricultural
trade with emphasis on resolution of sanitary and phytosanitary
restrictions; particular concerns regarding NAFTA; and the on-going
bilateral meetings between the United States and Mexico.
Members discussed specific barriers to United States agriculture
exports and the importance of market access as a basis for equitable
bilateral trade.
MEXICO
Mexico is the United States' third-largest trading partner, with
total trade values expected to exceed $140 billion in 1997. This
is exceeded only by Canada and Japan. The United States is the
dominant supplier of agricultural products to Mexico, providing
almost 75 percent of its agricultural imports. The most important
U.S. agricultural exports to Mexico in value terms are wheat,
corn, soybeans, cotton, forest products, and animal products,
including red meat, poultry and dairy products. In fiscal year
1996, agricultural trade between Mexico and the United States
reached $8.7 billion, with a $1.7 billion surplus to the United
States. Agriculture exports to the United States from Mexico include
fruits and vegetables, coffee, cattle, and seafood. The six most
important agriculture imports from Mexico to the United States
in value terms are tomatoes, peppers, onions, cucumbers, grapes
and melons. These commodities account for about one-third of total
agricultural imports from Mexico.
Members of the Committee met with Mexico's Secretaries of Agriculture
(SAGAR) Francisco Labastida and Commerce (SECOFI) Herminio Blanco
to discuss trade issues. Members also met with their Congressional
counterparts and Mexican agribusiness leaders, emphasizing the
U.S. desire that the Mexican government improve market access
by eliminating sanitary and phytosanitary barriers to trade.
BRIEFINGS FOLLOWING THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE'S TRIP TO
MEXICO
Upon return, Chairman Smith and Members of the Committee discussed
results of the meetings in Mexico and their observations with
the Secretary of Agriculture, the Honorable Dan Glickman, and
the President's Special Envoy for the Americas, Mr. Thomas (Mack)
McLarty.
Chairman Smith and Members of the Committee Delegation wrote to
the President to advise him of the Committee's trip and the issues
related to access to the markets of Mexico for United States agricultural
products. They requested that the President take concrete actions
as a demonstration of our willingness to continue working toward
solving agricultural trade issues each country has encountered.
It was recommended that the U.S. recognize the Mexican State of
Sonora as hog cholera free and the Mexicali Valley as Karnal bunt
free. It is expected that the United States will receive similar
flexibility toward U.S. products by Mexico. The Chairman also
wrote to the Secretary of Agriculture, the U.S. Trade Representative,
and the President's Special Envoy for the Americas informing them
of the trip's results.
MEXICO BRIEFINGS/MEETINGS
Mexico City, Mexico
March 31 - April 2, 1997
Mexico City, Mexico:
U.S. Ambassador James R. Jones
Deputy Chief of Mission Charles Brayshaw
Minister Counselor for Agricultural Affairs Norval Francis
Senior Agricultural Attaché Rod McSherry
Minister Counselor for Economics William Brew
Secretary of Agriculture Francisco Labastida
Secretary of Commerce Herminio Blanco
Asociacion de Proveedores de Productos Agropecuario Mexico Ac. (APPAMEX) (Mexican Grain Importers Association), Arturo C. Enriquez
Consejo Nacional Agropecuario (National Agriculture Committee), Miguel Castro
Farmland Industries, Stephen Dees
CoBank, David Barraza
Laredo, Texas
April 4, 1997
Laredo, Texas:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS),
Regional Director Peter J. Fernandez
APHIS, Senior Program Manager Phillip Garcia
APHIS, Port Director Jose Uribe
APHIS, Director of Field Operations, Edwin J. Bowers
Minister Counselor for Commercial Affairs Kevin C. Brennan
U.S. Customs Service, Port Director Leticia Moran
Immigration and Naturalization Service, Area Port Director Ramone T. Juarez
Food and Drug Administration, District Director Joseph Baca
Major Issues Discussed
--- The Committee Delegation agrees with Mexico, that if
the State of Sonora is found to be hog cholera free by USDA/APHIS
there should be established a protocol allowing hogs from this
region into the United States. The Mexicans also asked that USDA/APHIS
look into consideration of the Yucatan as hog cholera free.
--- The Committee Delegation agrees with Mexico that if the Mexicali
Valley is found to be Karnal bunt free by USDA/APHIS there should
be established a protocol allowing wheat from this region in the
United States.
The issue of fumigating all shipments of wheat was discussed with
the Members. It was suggested by the Members that the Mexican
milling industry should be asked to certify what imports are for
milling purposes only, since this was done primarily for seed
wheat.
The issue of import licenses/trading certificates was raised.
The Members urged Mexican authorities to use this system as a
permit system to facilitate imports, since formal paperwork and
inspections must be performed separately. The Members asked the
Mexican authorities to review this practice, which may be impeding
free trade.
--- Regionalization was discussed as a key to the U.S.-Mexico
trading relationship. By identifying sanitary and phytosanitary
restrictions and the regions to which they are associated, both
countries can identify the issues and work to resolve them. Isolating
one region in which a problem may be found, or opening up a region
which has never had the problem in question, can enhance the trade
relationship between Mexico and the United States. It was agreed
that implementation of NAFTA regionalization requirements would
contribute to freer trade.
--- There were several issues raised in regard to railroad and
trucking delays at the border. Delays stem from too many rail
cars at the border at one time, trucking regulations at the border
which delay shipments because of unloading and reloading, and
a limited work week to handle the increase in trade. The Committee
Delegation suggested that a longer work week is necessary, possibly
even 7 days, to handle the workload. There also appears to be
a commercial problem, because rail companies load cars before
they are ready with the paperwork. This also causes border delays.
--- The United States has approved $125 million under the GSM-103
credit guarantee program for Mexico. The intent of this funding
is to encourage Mexico to buy U.S. breeder cattle. The problem,
as was discussed particularly with Secretary Blanco (SECOFI),
is associated with the Mexican banks. During the peso devaluation
of 1995 many banks and financial institutions were adversely affected.
The Central Bank of Mexico instituted very restrictive rules for
financial institutions, requiring high interest rates and short
repayment periods for most loans. This has made borrowing by farmers
and ranchers, even with guarantees, difficult.
--- Issues with particular commodities that were discussed
include:
--- Both sides agreed that discussions are needed to work toward
tariff reductions to expand trade between the U.S. and Mexico.
--- There were also areas in which agreements have been made that
appear to benefit both sides. These include: regionalizing areas
in the United States and Mexico so that U.S. cherries may be exported
to Mexico and Mexican avocados may be imported into specific areas
of the United States; a separate agreement in regard to the importation
into the United States of tomatoes from Mexico; and the continued
export of U.S. pears and apples to Mexico.
--- Both sides also discussed the idea that in the global economy,
especially for agriculture, trade should not be viewed in terms
of the United States and Mexico, but the Western Hemisphere versus
Asia and the European Union. NAFTA is a dynamic treaty and both
sides have to make adjustments for each other's economies.