SUMMARY OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE TRIP TO THAILAND AND
THE PHILIPPINES
Committee Members traveled to Bangkok, Thailand and Manila, the
Philippines to meet with government officials and private sector
organizations on matters related to U.S. agriculture trade. The
United States shares the goals of open and fair trade and the
reduction of barriers to world-wide agriculture trade. The issues
discussed included non-tariff trade barriers; liberalization of
world-wide agriculture trade, and continuation of agriculture
trade reform.
Members discussed specific barriers to United States agriculture
exports and the importance of trading partners having access to
each others' markets in order to have equitable bilateral trade.
THAILAND
Thailand ranks among the top 20 markets for U.S. food and agricultural
products. The U.S. exported $622 million of agriculture products
to Thailand in 1996 and imported $1.9 billion of Thai agriculture
products. Thai economic development policies based on competitive,
exportoriented, free market philosophy are enabling the
transition from an agricultural based economy to a more open and
broadly based economy with a large manufacturing sector. One clear
outcome of Thailand's rapid economic growth over the past decade
has been the emergence of a growing middleclass, with significant
purchasing power reflected, in rising sales of consumerready,
highvalue food products. While domestically produced food
items constitute the majority of the consumerready food
market, imported food products are increasingly evident in retail
outlets and on restaurant menus.
Although the economic trends are quite favorable for continued growth and expansion of the consumerready food market, Members of the Delegation spoke with Deputy Prime Minister Amnuay and other government officials about Thailand's high tariff structure for these items, which constrain the demand for imported food products. Duties on imported food items remain in the 40 to 60 percent range, with only a few exceptions, notably apples at 10 percent.
Fresh fruits are an important part of the Thai diet. Although
there is an abundance of local, tropical fruits, many Thai consumers
regularly eat imported fresh fruits. These fruits are often used
as part of a gift basket for special occasions. Apples,
grapes, peaches, pears, kiwis, and citrus fruits all have
good market potential. The popularity of imported wines continues
to grow at an amazing pace. While most sales originally concentrated
in the hotel and restaurant industry, imported wine and beer sales
are increasingly taking place in the retail sector.
Dried fruits and nuts packaged in the United States are popular items in supermarkets, but the food processing sector will likely be the source of most growth in the future. These items are imported in bulk, then packaged or mixed with other products to develop a snack food for domestic sale or reexport. Currently, almonds are the major imported product in this category, while sales of pistachios and dried fruit are expected to increase.
Despite U.S. export successes, competition remains steep. Thailand's
protection of its domestic food processing sector, through the
use of tariffs and nontariff barriers, has resulted in a
tremendous expansion of domestically manufactured snack foods,
beverages, and other consumerready food products. Abundant
domestic supply of relatively good quality fresh fruits and vegetables,
processed fruits and vegetables, juices, poultry meat and other
products provides strong competition for imports.
PHILIPPINES
In 1996, U.S. agricultural exports to the Philippines were at
a record high of approximately $888 million. Consumer-oriented
agricultural products accounted for $177 million, intermediate
products amounted to a record $190 million and bulk products amounted
to $520 million. U.S. agricultural imports from the Philippines
in 1996 were $554 million, with intermediate agricultural products
valued at around $400 million, consumer-oriented imports totaled
about $176 million and bulk commodities imports were valued at
$10 million.
Members of the Delegation met with President Ramos and other government
officials to discuss trade issues between the United States and
the Philippines. The Philippines has long been a valued trading
partner of the United States. The U.S. is the second largest purchaser
of Filipino exports (next to Japan) and American products represent
19% of all Filipino imports. Since President Ramos' election in
1992, the Philippines have been liberalizing their trade and privatizing
several sectors of the economy, including agriculture. The Filipino
government appears to be strongly committed to these reforms and
the resultant economic successes they have created. A growing
middle class is stabilizing the prospering country.
Currently, the major outstanding issue between the U.S. and the
Philippines is the Filipino failure to implement their Uruguay
Round tariff rate quota commitment on pork and poultry. On April
1, 1997, the U.S. notified the Philippine Government that it intend
to bring the matter to the World Trade Organization.
In the Uruguay Round, the Philippines agreed to minimum access
volume (MAV) for pork and poultry, among other agricultural products,
agreeing initially to allow 32,520 metric tons pork imports annually
at a 30 percent tariff, and 14,090 metric tons of poultry meat
imports at a 50 percent tariff.
The 1995 Philippine MAV quotas were to have been in place beginning
July 1, 1995. The United States raised the issue of Philippine
implementation in the WTO Committee on Agriculture in November
1995, but did not take further action based on bilateral assurances
from the Philippine Government that it was working to implement
its commitments by January 1, 1996. However, the Philippine Congress
failed to pass the necessary implementing legislation until March
1996. Under its implementing regulations, the Philippines was
to have opened its minimum access Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQ's) for
pork and poultry meat by August 1, 1996, and the quota amount
included the cumulative quantities from 1995 and 1996.
In addition, the licenses necessary to import these products were
not issued until October 1996, leaving a little more than two
months to import 18 months worth of product. [Importers of pork
who imported without licenses were required to pay the 30% tariff
and also pay an additional 70% deposit. Importers under the 1996
TRQ to date have not received refunds on those deposits.]
Furthermore, the bulk of licenses were allocated to the Philippine
pork producers and poultry integrators (a type of producer/processor),
who have little interest in importing. Regarding poultry, the
integrators currently hold virtually all of the import licenses
and it is unclear given the oversupply of poultry in the Philippines
how much poultry will be imported in 1997. Consequently, in order
to fully utilize the quota, the U.S. may also need to seek some
type of reallocation of MAV licenses for poultry. The 1995/96
MAV for poultry was 22,000 metric tons compared to a 1997 MAV
of 16,160 metric tons.
Over the last year, in bilateral and multilateral meetings, the
US raised the Philippines' delay in issuing import licenses. In
response, the Philippine government proposed renegotiating its
import commitments for pork, poultry meat and live poultry, citing
the need for "technical" corrections.
BRIEFINGS FOLLOWING THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICUTURE'S TRIP TO THAILAND
AND THE PHILIPPINES
Upon return, Chairman Smith discussed the results of the meetings
in Bangkok and Manila and his observations with the United States
Trade Representative, the Honorable Charlene Barshefsky and, in
a separate meeting, with the Thailand Ambassador to the United
States Ambassador Nitya.
Chairman Smith and Members of the Committee Delegation wrote to the Thai and Filipino officials concerning the matters discussed with government officials during the committee trip.
The Chairman and two Members from the Committee on Agriculture
formed the delegation from May 24 - June 1, 1997 to Thailand and
the Philippines.
Thailand
Issues:
Committee Delegation Meetings:
1. Mr. David L. Hendrix, The American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand
2. The Honorable Prachuab, Minister of Foreign Affairs
3. The Honorable Narongchai, Minister of Commerce
4. Thai Business Council
Philippines
Issues:
Committee Delegation Meetings:
1. Senator Juan Ponce Enrile, Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee
2. The Honorable Domingo Siazon, Jr., Secretary of Foreign Affairs
3. The Honorable Fidel V. Ramos, President, the Philippines
4. The Honorable Jose de Venecia, Speaker of the House of Representatives
5. The Honorable Joseph Estrada, Vice President, the Philippines
6. The Honorable Salvador Escudero, Secretary of Agriculture
THAILAND/BRIEFINGS/MEETINGS
Bangkok, Thailand
May 26 - May 27, 1997
U.S. Charge D'Affairs Skip Boyce
U.S. Agriculture Counselor Peter Kurz
U.S. Agriculture Attaché Scott Sindelar
Mr. David L. Hendrix, The American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand
Mr. Prachuab, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Dr. Narongchai, Minister of Commerce
Dr. Amnuay, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance
Dr. Pravat, Deputy Minister of Agriculture and Cooperatives
Major Issues Discussed
-----Several fruit exports have tremendous potential in Thailand.
In accordance with the Uruguay Round trade agreement, Thailand's
import duty on most fresh fruit is scheduled to be reduced from
60% to 40% over the next six years. The U.S. industry's repeated
efforts, together with those of USDA/FAS, to achieve a more commercially
advantageous import duty of 10% have not been successful.
------ Despite advancements in technology and a supply of skilled
labor, Thai livestock producers' competitiveness is being reduced
by the high cost of production. The problem of increasing production
costs is the high cost of feed and import controls on these feed
stuffs by the Thai government. The office of Agricultural Economics
(OAE) reported that livestock production costs for independent
farms in 1995 rose by 10%, directly attributed to the 5 -10 %
increase in prices for commercial feed. By way of specific example,
Thai's broiler production costs in 1995, rose by 10% to 22.90
baht/kg live weight ($.42/pound), as opposed to 20.90 baht/kg
($.38/pound) in 1994, due to increased prices for chicken feed
ingredients.
----- Thailand requires rice imports to be accompanied by a unique
phytosanitary certificate. APHIS does not usually provide certification
for supplemental concerns. APHIS only issues a routine phytosanitary
certificate carrying a generic statement about pest freedom for
processed rice that is packaged and ready for retail sale. Thailand
is the world's leading exporter of long-grain rice, yet it does
not allow entry of medium grain processed rice.
----- Although the economic trends are quite favorable for continued
growth and expansion of the consumer-ready food market, Thailand's
high tariff structure for these items constrains the demand for
imported food products. Duties on imported food items remain in
the 40% to 60% range, with only a few exceptions.
Apart from high tariffs, Thailand's time consuming and cumbersome
licensing and registration procedure can delay the entry of new
products into the market. Importers of many goods are required
to obtain an import license from the Ministry of Commerce. In
addition, all importers of food products must be licensed with
the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Most consumer ready
products are deemed to be "specific control" products.
There products must be registered at an additional fee and undergo
extensive product analysis.
Thailand often requires proprietary information on imported processed
food products without providing assurances that the information
will be kept private. Many U.S. companies are not willing to share
percentages of ingredients or detailed processing information
and therefore forego any export possibilities.
PHILIPPINE/BRIEFINGS/MEETINGS
Manila, the Philippines
May 28 - June 1, 1997
The Honorable Tom Hubbard, U.S. Ambassador to the Philippines
U.S. Agriculture Counsel Kathy Ting
U.S. Agriculture Attaché John Wade
Senator Juan Ponce Enrile, Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee
The Honorable Domingo Siazon, Jr., Secretary of Foreign Affairs
The Honorable Fidel V. Ramos, President, the Philippines
The Honorable Jose de Venecia, Speaker of the House of Representatives
The Honorable Joseph Estrada, Vice President, the Philippines
The Honorable Salvador Escudero, Secretary of Agriculture
Mr. Bill G. Armstrong, President, American Chamber of Commerce
The Honorable Cesar Bautista, Secretary of Trade and Industry
Major Issues Discussed:
-----After a delay of over one year, the Philippine government
appeared to be ready to implement its Uruguay Round trade commitments
during the summer of 1996. However, rather than allocating the
tariff rate quota (TRQ) to Philippine processors or other parties
that have a demand for imported pork, over 80% of the TRQ was
allocated to Philippine hog producers. Further, requirements such
as the posting of 100% of the value of the shipment, compromised
the participation of other importers. Not surprising, the result
was a minimal level of pork imports in 1996. In spite of allocating
the TRQ late in 1996 that was deficient in various ways, the Philippine
government did not permit the carry-over into 1997 of unused TRQ
from 1996.
-----To open discussions on the possibility of exporting Florida
citrus to the Philippines, APHIS has provided a pest list specific
to Florida to Philippine officials. This list can be used to develop
pest risk assessments to determine whether Florida citrus can
be exported and under what mitigative measures. At this point,
APHIS has not received a response from the Philippines. APHIS
will continue to work with Philippine officials on this issue.
-----The Philippines is a solid, dependable wheat customer
of the United States. It is projected to import 2 million tons
of wheat in marketing year (MY) 1996/1997 (July/June), including
1.6 million tons from the U.S. However, Philippine wheat imports
are predicted to dip slightly next year because of a decrease
in demand for wheat as a feed ingredient.
The Philippines imported a total of 515,000 MT of corn in MY1995/1996,
their highest import level ever. Approximately 80 percent came
from the United States. Demand for corn in the Philippines should
continue to rise largely due to the widening gap between domestic
production and food and feed consumption. The Philippine government
has extremely high tariffs (100 percent out-of-quota) on feed
grains. As a result, milling wheat, imported under a 10 percent
tariff, is being diverted into feed channels and displacing US
corn.
In both 1996 and 1997, the Philippines has been one of the world's
major importers of rice. Limits on areas planted to rice, as well
as stagnating yields, are forcing the Philippines into a chronic
net deficit position. Rice imports, however, touch a sensitive
political nerve among the nation's farmers. At the same time,
rapid increases in rice prices caused considerable unrest in Manila
in late 1995. As a result, the Philippine government, while making
substantial purchases, has been careful to time purchases in order
to avoid any market disruptions.
-----Mango exportation to the U.S. is pending a required study
on Vapor Heat Treatment (VHT) efficacy for the two species of
fruit flies that exist in the Philippines. APHIS has promised
to send trained technicians and they have issued an invitation
for Filipino scientists to study the testing procedures in the
U.S.