House Committee on Agriculture

Subcommittee on Department Operation, Nutrition, and Foreign Agriculture Hearing - March 12, 1997




Congressman Bob Goodlatte

Chairman, Subcommittee on Department Operations,

Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture

Opening Statement

Review of EBT Implementation Hearing

March 12, 1997

The purpose of this hearing is to receive testimony and written statements reviewing the status of the electronic benefit transfer system (EBT) for the food stamp program. The welfare reform bill that we passed last year generally encourages states to implement EBT systems for delivery of benefits - these systems use "ATM-like" cards instead of paper coupons- and states are expected to implement EBT systems by 2002. States have been given more control over the design of their EBT systems (without prior federal approval), and requirements for showing that systems are cost neutral are eased. Their EBT-system expenses are limited (they may charge recipients for replacing EBT cards). A Federal Reserve Board rule, Regulation E, has been overridden, thereby increasing incentives for states to operate EBT systems by removing potential financial liability imposed by the rule.

I support the rapid implementation of EBT systems because I have long been concerned about the integrity and dignity of the food stamp program. EBT gives us a great opportunity to reduce the waste fraud and abuse that costs the food stamp program and tax payers millions of dollars a year . Also, it injects dignity into the program by allowing participants to use the same point of sale card swipe machine that credit card users employ. No longer will food stamp beneficiaries have to use the unique and sometimes embarrassing coupons.

I have heard several complaints and success stories about the implementation process. Several issues will be discussed this morning, some of which will include the security of the EBT cards; the contracting practices which states have to employ; and interoperability of state systems, and issue that is very important to me. Last year the full committee accepted by sense of the Congress amendment to encourage states to design their EBT systems to be interoperable with each other.

I look forward to hearing the witnesses testimony today. We have assembled uniquely qualified witnesses that will provide insight into EBT implementation problems, successes and timelines.

I would now like to recognize the Ranking Member of the Subcommittee, Mrs. Clayton from North Carolina.