FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 12, 1998
Contact: Chris Matthews
(202) 225-4050
WASHINGTON, D.C. - AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT FAILURE TO ENACT NEEDED
REFORMS IN USDA FARM LOAN PROGRAMS HAS RECEIVED CRITICISM FROM
LARRY COMBEST (R-TX), CHAIRMAN OF THE AGRICULTURE SUBCOMMITTEE
ON FORESTRY, RESOURCE CONSERVATION, AND RESEARCH.
While USDA revealed plans during a Wednesday agriculture
subcommittee hearing to restore loan eligibility for borrowers
with past debt relief, Subcommittee Chairman Combest raised concerns
that the Agriculture Department may have gone too far in relaxing
credit standards.
Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agriculture
Gus Schumacher, Jr. testified that Secretary Dan Glickman's official
proposal would allow for two cases of debt forgiveness in addition
to an exemption should debt forgiveness be necessitated by weather
disaster, family medical crisis, or as settlement of a civil rights
case.
Combest indicated that he would prefer to narrow
credit provisions to permit borrowers with past write downs to
qualify only for loans guaranteed by USDA, but exclude them from
direct lending. Under guaranteed loans, private lenders know they
face potential exposure for 10 percent of the loan as they review
an applicant with past write-downs.
"For some time, I have called for USDA review
of appropriate adjustments to the lending program. USDA's proposal
however, may go too far in relaxing credit standards. We need
a middle ground to allow truly credit-worthy borrowers to qualify
for USDA loans while ensuring the integrity of the loan program,"
Combest said of the hearing.
USDA Under Secretary Schumacher also confirmed that
the Department continues at work on standards for the Preferred
Lender Program for guaranteed loans. Six years ago, Combest authored
legislation streamlining and simplifying the Preferred Lender
Program. However, USDA still has yet to finalize regulations to
make the loan processing system conform to congressional direction.
Combest expressed his disappointment with USDA's target of 1999
for implementation of the new rules.
"I am disappointed that the Department is just
now working on regulations for a program that was authorized in
1992 legislation. Time is way past due for streamlining this and
other lending programs," Combest said.
Congress had enacted statutory changes to farm credit
provisions in response to the farm recession of the mid-1980s.
Excessive loan losses and write off of past debt focused criticism
on provisions of the Consolidated Farm Rural Development Act (ConAct),
though principally on the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987. Subsequent
reports from The General Accounting Office criticized the USDA
loan servicing provisions for allowing delinquent borrowers to
avoid foreclosure and receive new and restructured loans, on which
they again became delinquent and subject to foreclosure. In some
cases, this process occurred on more than one occasion.
Congress responded with 1996 Farm Bill provisions
that curtailed the rescheduling or re-amortizing of loans unless
the borrower paid a portion of the interest due on the loan. The
Secretary was also prohibited from making new loans to delinquent
borrowers for any direct or guaranteed loan, as well as making
or guaranteeing loans to borrowers receiving past debt relief.
Combest represents Texas' 19th
Congressional District which includes the Panhandle, South Plains,
and Permian Basin.